The supplied screenshots show JEANV publicly criticizing alleged cheating while a separate transaction screenshot under the same display name shows a purchase from a cheat provider. Curse-X considers that contrast hypocritical. These are selected screenshots—not independent proof of account ownership or an exact chronology.
skirkenjoyeruwuDiscord handle shown in the supplied profile screenshot; account ownership is not independently verified.The supplied GunZ Discord capture shows JEANV mentioning a clan member who is friends with a hack provider and attaching a ZxPwd profile image. The screenshot has a relative “yesterday” timestamp, not a verified calendar date.
Cropped public-post screenshot supplied by Curse-X; surrounding comments excluded.
A separate private-chat screenshot under the JEANV display name shows questions about a trial, payment methods, and a customer Discord server.
Private-chat excerpt supplied by Curse-X. A September 4, 2026 divider is visible within this capture.
This is the central transaction screenshot. It shows a purchase conversation under the JEANV display name; the voucher code itself is permanently redacted in this public copy.
Opaque, flattened redaction covers the code. The original was not uploaded.
Further private-chat excerpts discuss a boss/quest sequence, leaving the game running, and how to stop the auto-quest loop. These captures support a discussion about use; they do not independently prove every feature was active.
Selected chat excerpts; a later game-room password was excluded from the public crop.
In another private excerpt, JEANV says they were reporting a different player because that player had reported them and was bothering them. This is separate from the public screenshot and should not be presented as proof that every reported player was a Curse-X customer.
Private-chat excerpt supplied by Curse-X. The other player's identity is not independently verified here.
Additional supplied captures show JEANV pressing accusations and proposed bans. Other participants questioned whether the screenshots established cheating and objected to the discussion becoming personal. These exchanges are worth reading beside the private purchase and feature conversations—not as proof that anyone JEANV named was cheating.
In the public discussion, participants said an initial screenshot did not demonstrate cheating and asked JEANV not to promote a provider by repeatedly naming them. That is their assessment, not a technical finding by Curse-X.
Selected public replies; relative timestamps are not independently dated.JEANV wrote that contact with a cheat provider was a valid reason to ban a clan member. The screenshot documents that claim; a social connection alone does not establish that the person cheated.
Public discussion excerpt supplied by Curse-X.A later post, visibly dated September 20, 2026, called several players hackers and criticized a prior ban. The named players and unrelated tags are removed from this public copy. Their conduct is not verified here.
Selected public post; other players' names and tags are redacted.Taken together, the captures show a contrast: public accusations about cheating and private conversations about buying and using a cheat service under the same display name. They do not establish JEANV's motive, prove the allegations against other players, or justify contacting anyone shown.
The screenshots present a clear contrast: public criticism of alleged hackers alongside a transaction conversation showing a purchase from a cheat provider. Curse-X considers that a hypocritical double standard. The screenshots were supplied by Curse-X; no original Discord links or stable numeric user ID were provided, so readers should judge the material in that limited context. This page is not an invitation to contact or harass anyone.
Have a correction or missing context? Contact zxpwd on Discord →